DESIGN PATENT PRO
  • Home
  • Cases
  • Law
  • Prosecution
  • Litigation
District Court Cases
2021

Gentian v. Tristar Prods.,
No. 13-1758 (NLH/AMD), 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151739 (D.N.J. Aug. 12, 2021)
USD722,681 (Expandable Hose), D724,186 (Expandable Hose Assembly)
Issues:  Inventorship
​
Fecon, Inc. v. Denis Cimaf, Inc.,
No. 1:18-cv-00748, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151678 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2021)
USD795,931 (Land Clearing Tool Interface)
Issues:  Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Infringement) and Functionality

Top Brand LLC v. Cozy Comfort Co. LLC,
No. CV-21-00597-PHX-SPL, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149093 (D. Ariz. Aug. 9, 2021)
USD859,788 (Enlarged over-garment with an elevated marsupial pocket), USD905,380 (Whole Body Blanket), USD886,416 (Overgarment with an elevated marsupial pocket), USD903,237 (Overgarment with an elevated marsupial pocket)
Issues:  Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Justiciable 
Controversy

Merrill Mfg. Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.,
No. 1:20-cv-3941-MLB, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148508 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 9, 2021)
USD881817 (Wire Connector)
Issues:  Motion to Dismiss claims for Contributory Infringement, Induced Infringement, and Willful Infringement

Jezign Licensing, Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Maxima Apparel Corp.,
No. 20-CV-1438-JLS (AGS), 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149189 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2021)
USD554,848 (Illuminated Shoe Lower)
Issues:  Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue

Trove Brands, LLC v. JH Studios, Inc.,
No. 8:19-cv-1809-KKM-AAS, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149340 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2021)
USD644,065 (Bottle)
Issues:  Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction, Damages, Attorney Fees

Shenzhen Tange Lian E-Commerce Co. v. Drone Whirl LLC,
No. 1:20-CV-00738-RP, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147563 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 6, 2021)
USD819,756 (Toy Figurine)
​Issues:  Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Range of Motion Prods. LLC v. Armaid Co.,
No. 1:21-cv-00105-JDL, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148150 (D. Me. Aug. 6, 2021)
USD802,155 (Body Massaging Apparatus)
Issue:  Preliminary Injunction

Luv N' Care v. Laurain,
No. 3:16-00777, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147365 (W.D. La. Aug. 5, 2021) (Judge Terry A. Doughty)
USD745,327 (Dining Mat with Integrated Tableware)
Issues:  Motions in Limine


Luv N' Care v. Laurain,
No. 3:16-00777, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147305 (W.D. La. Aug. 5, 2021) (Judge Terry A. Doughty)
USD745,327 (Dining mat with integrated tableware)
​Issue:  Motion to Strike Supplemental Expert Report

Sz Dji Tech. Co., LTD v. Autel Robotics United States, LLC & Autel Aerial Tech. Co., LTD,
No. 16-706-LPS, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145721 (D. Del. Aug. 4, 2021) (Judge Leonard P. Stark)
Issues:  Motions in Limine, Trial Schedule, Time Allocated for Trial

Glam & Glits Nail Design, Inc. v. iGel Beauty, LLC,
No. SACV 20-88, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144465 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2021) (Judge James V. Selna)
USD758,737 (Nail Polish Bottle)
​Issues:  Personal Jurisdiction, Jurisdictional Discovery

Converse Inc. v. Steven Madden, Ltd.,
No. 1:20-cv-11032, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144069 (D. Mass. Aug. 2, 2021) (Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton)
​Opinion  Complaint  Motion to Dismiss  Opposition  Reply
USD873,547 (Shoe), USD874,106 (Shoe)

GlobalTap, LLC v. Petersen Mfg. Co.,
No. 1:18-cv-05383, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144245 (N.D. Ill. July 29, 2021)

Ascion, LLC v. Tempur Sealy Int'l, Inc.,
No. 5:17-cv-403, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140726 (E.D. Ky. July 28, 2021)

Jezign Licensing, Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Bebe Stores, Inc.,
No. 20-CV-1064, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134166 (S.D. Cal. July 19, 2021)

Solutions v. Amberstone Enterprises LLC,
No. 21-80649-CIV, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145427 (S.D. Fla. July 16, 2021)

Tristar Prods. v. Ocean State Jobbers, Inc.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132006, Case No. 17-1767 (D. N.J. July 15, 2021)
USD772,641 (Pan)

Medcursor Inc. v. Shenzen KLM Internet Trading Co.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110287, Case No. 2:21-cv-02843 (C.D. Cal. June 10, 2021)

Tr. of the Summers Family Trust TA Neak Prods. Buff WA Pty v. Nat'l Distrib. Warehouse,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108301, Case No. 2:20-cv-10741 (C.D. Cal. June 7, 2021)

Simple Prods. Corp. v. Huang,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103862, Case No. 2:19-cv-00317 (D. Utah June 1, 2021)

Delta T, LLC v. Dan's Fan City, Inc.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100418, 2021 WL 2159889, Case No. 8:19-cv-1731 (M.D. Fla. May 27, 2021)

Sure Fit Home Prods., LLC v. Maytex Mills, Inc.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99830, 2021 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 584, 2021 WL 2134863, Case No. 21 Civ. 2169 (S.D.N.Y May 26, 2021)

Delta T, LLC v. Dan's Fan City, Inc.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98131, 2021 WL 2103074, Case No. 8:19-cv-1731 (M.D. Fla. May 25, 2021)

Bradley Corp. v. Lawler Mfg. Co.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99596, 2021 WL 2139047, Case No. 1:19-cv-01240 (S.D. Ind. May 25, 2021)

​Golden Eye Media USA, Inc. v. Trolley Bags UK Ltd.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97992, 2021 WL 2072382, Case No. 3:18-cv-02109 (S.D. Cal. May 24, 2021)

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Varona,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93697, 2021 WL 2008198, Case No. 19-24838-Civ (S.D. Fla. May 18, 2021)

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Varona,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92086, 2021 WL 1997573, Case No. 19-24838-Civ (S.D. Fla. May 11, 2021)

​
Delta T v. Dan's Fan City,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89836, Case No. 8:19-cv-1731 (M.D. Fla. May 10, 2021)

Cardinal Motors, Inc. v. H&H Sports Prot. USA, Inc.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85335, 2021 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 499, 2021 WL 1758881, Case No. 1:20-cv-07899 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2021)

Am. Pac. Indus. v. Yerrou,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83862, 2021 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 489, 2021 WL 1738983, Case No. 3:20-cv-273 (S.D. Miss. May 3, 2021)

Furrion Prop. Holding Ltd. v. Way Interglobal Network,
LLC, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79884, 2021 WL 1625148, Case No. 3:19-cv-566 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 27, 2021)

Medcursor Inc. v. Shenzen KLM Internet Trading Co.,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78113, 2021 WL 2024858, Case No. 2:21-cv-02843 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2021)



Delta T v. Dan's Fan City,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24422, 
Case No. 8:19cv1731 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 9, 2021) 

Ontel Prods. Corp. v. John,
​2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23301, Case No. 20-13118 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2021)

Patent Holder Identified In Exhibit 1 v. Does,
2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22863, Case No. 21cv00514 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 6, 2021)

Oakley, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A," Defendants,
2021 U.S. Dist LEXIS 17937, Case No. 21C536 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 2021)

Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Varona,
  2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13659, Case No. 19-24838 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 25, 2021)

TV Ears, Inc. v. Joyshiya Development Ltd.,
  2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10071, Case No. 3:20cv01708 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 19, 2021)

Junker v. Medical Components, Inc.,
  2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7694, Case No. 13-4606 (E.D. Penn. Jan 14, 2021)

​2020

Evolve BioSystems, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., Inc.,
  2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 237434, Case No. 19cv5859 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 17, 2020)

Simplehuman v. Itouchless Housewares & Prods.,
  2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238140, Case No. 4:19cv02701 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2020)

Evriholder Prods., LLC v. Simply LBS Ltd. Co.,
  2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230226, Case No. 17cv4329 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2020)

Bradley Corp. v. Lawler Mfg. Co.,
  2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 222853, Case No. 1:19cv01240 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 30, 2020)

Lanard Toys v. Anker Play Products,
  2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221783, Case No. 19-4350 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2020)

​Cal. Beach Co., LLC v. Exqline, Inc.,
​  2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209513, Case No. 20-01994 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2020)
Copyright © 2022, All rights reserved, Robert G. Oake, Jr.,  Oake Law Office, PLLC, 700 S. Central Expressway, Suite 400, Allen, Texas 75013  rgo@oake.com

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This website is owned and maintained by Oake Law Office, PLLC (the Law Office). The information on this website is general in nature and should not be considered as legal advice or legal opinion.  Although efforts are made to maintain the accuracy of the information on this website, omissions or errors may occur. The Law Office disclaims any liability as to the information on this website.  This website is not an offer to represent you or to perform legal services. An attorney-client relationship with the Law Office only will be established after the Law Office decides that it is willing and able to accept the engagement, and the Law Office and the client enter into a written engagement letter.
  • Home
  • Cases
  • Law
  • Prosecution
  • Litigation